Sunday, August 22, 2010

The Case for Attacking Iran's Nukes

In what way is Iran a "strategic threat"?



Clever piece of writing though, beginning with throwing a few crumbs to those with some concerns about Israel and passing reference to Palestinian rights - glossed over - but sullied by making it seem as though the US has only recently put pressure on Israel, whereas for decades there has been total support, with occasional show-piece cosmetic and rhetorical criticisms.



But even if you were right that the US is, or has tried to be an "honest broker", there is no warrant nor evidence to point to Iran as a "strategic flashpoint".



In what way? All you use is the old canards we've been hearing for years.



Your opening paragraphs were just a launch-pad for a vitriolic distribe against Iran, culminating in the the ridiculous equating of Iran with Nazi Germany, even bringing the old warmonger Churchill into the affair ... yes he had the flair to unite British people when under attack by Germany, but obviously you know nothing of his past activities, why was marginalized and swiftly dumped after WW2.



When has Iran ever attacked anyone else? Do Iranians believe they are the "master race'? You don't have a leg to stand on, so you just recycle unfounded Washington and Tel Aviv accusations to 'justify' attacking Iran, i.e. mass murder, not to mince words.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

No comments:

Post a Comment